The Surprising Motive

-

Have you ever noticed how we assume we know exactly how people will react, especially in online games? You’d think that after spending countless hours interacting with other players, their behaviors would become predictable. But recently, something happened to me in Ikariam—one of those online strategy games—that completely challenged my assumptions.

Let me set the scene: I'd positioned my troops in an alliance member's city to launch an attack on another player. Pretty standard move, right? But, of course, the player I attacked wasn't pleased and decided to retaliate—not against me, but against the innocent alliance member whose city I’d borrowed.

Immediately, I felt guilty. Wouldn't you? It's one thing to face consequences yourself, but quite another to put someone else’s resources and efforts at risk. So, I quickly messaged the attacker, explained it was entirely my decision, and even returned the resources I'd looted as a gesture of good faith.

Here's where things got interesting. Normally, you'd expect an alliance member in this situation to feel annoyed, maybe even angry. And it makes sense—they didn't sign up to be your human shield, after all. I've seen it happen before, and the reactions were never pleasant.

But surprisingly, this time was different. My alliance member didn’t react with annoyance. Instead, he casually brushed off my apology and even seemed disappointed that I'd resolved the situation peacefully. "You should've kept attacking," he told me. And then he added something I didn't see coming: "If he attacked me, I'd delete him from the game."

Wait, what?

Why would someone openly invite conflict, especially when they're not even responsible for starting it? Was he just being reckless? Was it about pride? Loyalty? Or was it something else entirely—something more nuanced and interesting?

Maybe he was genuinely excited by the potential drama. Could it be that, for some players, conflict itself is part of the fun? Instead of shying away from battle, maybe some of us actually look forward to it, seeing the risks as opportunities to demonstrate strength, courage, or even friendship. Perhaps, for my ally, standing firm was a matter of honor. It wasn't about resources or safety; it was about making a statement: "Mess with my alliance, and you'll regret it."

It also made me wonder: How often do we underestimate people's willingness to support us simply because it seems risky? How often do we prematurely assume they'll resent us for involving them in our problems, only to find out later that they genuinely wanted to help?

This experience in Ikariam surprised me precisely because it challenged my assumptions about motivation and risk in online games. Players aren't just predictable strategic entities—behind those screens are real people whose decisions are driven by complex, surprising reasons. Loyalty, pride, excitement, and camaraderie—these intangible, human motives shape our virtual worlds more profoundly than any simple strategy.

Maybe that's the real surprise: even in the virtual worlds we think we fully understand, people will always find ways to surprise us. And isn't that what makes these experiences so fascinating?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No more data loss 3-2-1 backup rule

-
 Have you ever wondered what it would be like to lose everything stored on your computer? All those documents, photos, projects—gone in an instant. It’s a terrifying thought, one that most people don’t really dwell on until it’s too late. But why do we take such risks with our digital lives? Let me ask you this: When was the last time you backed up your data? And no, I’m not talking about that occasional transfer of photos to an external hard drive whenever you remember. I mean a systematic, foolproof backup strategy. We often underestimate the fragility of our digital world, assuming that our data is safe simply because it's on a modern device. But is that really enough? The Simple Genius of the 3-2-1 Rule This is where the 3-2-1 backup rule comes in. It’s a strategy that’s as simple as it is effective: 3 copies of your data. 2 different types of storage. 1 off-site backup. Why three copies? Because redundancy is your safety net. If one copy gets corrupted, you have two more to...
Read more

How Advice Can Make You Dumb

-
Have you ever found yourself at a crossroads, paralyzed by indecision, and then eagerly turned to others for advice? It’s a natural reaction. We seek guidance from friends, family, mentors, or even strangers on the internet, hoping they have the answers we can’t find on our own. But what if I told you that advice, while well-intentioned, might actually be making us less capable of thinking clearly and independently? What if the layers of advice we accumulate over time become a fog, obscuring our ability to think from first principles? Let's break this down. Why do we seek advice in the first place? Often, it's because we're uncertain. We crave certainty and look for someone who seems to have it. But what if that certainty is just an illusion? What if advice isn't a one-size-fits-all solution but a one-size-fits-one? Advice often reflects the adviser’s experiences, biases, and circumstances, not ours. It’s like borrowing a pair of shoes; they might fit, but more often th...
Read more

Maximizing the indvidual difference: why radical change cause upheaval

-
Sometimes I wonder if the ultimate goal of existence is to maximize difference. Observing the world and the systems humans have built, it seems that the more pronounced the material and immaterial differences, the greater the rewards. Take, for example, a university professor. The knowledge they accumulate sets them apart from their students, creating a difference that is rewarded. The more knowledge they acquire, the more this difference grows, and consequently, the more they are rewarded. This dynamic is also evident among students. Those who manage to distinguish themselves by accumulating knowledge or skills that set them apart from their peers increase their chances of future success, assuming these differences are positive and valued by society. In essence, the lecture itself is an exercise in minimizing the knowledge gap between the professor and the students. However, if we could somehow eliminate this difference instantly, the system would collapse. The entire educational inst...
Read more